Defaults path of Certbot are the following:
config: /etc/letsencrypt
workdir: /var/letsencrypt/lib
logs: /var/letsencrypt/log
On Windows, this translate into:
config: C:\etc\letsencrypt
workdir: C:\var\letsencrypt\lib
logs: C:\var\letsencrypt\log
As Windows does not follow the standard POSIX filesystem layout, theses paths do not have a lot of sense in this case.
This PR sets the following default paths when Certbot is run on Windows:
config: C:\Certbot
workdir: C:\Certbot\lib
logs: C:\Certbot\log
Better to decide the default paths for Certbot before users start to run it on Windows, to avoid future migration procedures.
* display: support validation of user input
To avoid each caller of `display.input` and `display.directory_select`
needing to implement validation logic, this allows for a validator to be
supplied as a part of the call.
Following the existing pattern from `webroot`, this validator is expected
to throw a `Error` when it encounters invalid input. The user then
receives a `notification` is re-prompted.
Testing Done:
* tox -e py27
* tox -e lint
* plugins: update webroot to use display's validation functionality
This change updates the webroot plugin to use the now-built-in validation
functionality in display, reducing duplicated code.
Testing Done:
* tox -e py27
* tox -e lint
* display: move validation logic to ops
To avoid adding complexity to `IDisplay` methods, move validation logic
to helper methods in `display.ops`.
Testing Done:
* tox -e py27
* tox -e lint
* CLI flag for forcing interactivity
* add --force-interactive
* Add force_interactive error checking and tests
* Add force_interactive parameter to FileDisplay
* add _can_interact
* Add _return_default
* Add **unused_kwargs to NoninteractiveDisplay
* improve _return_default assertion
* Change IDisplay calls and write tests
* Document force_interactive in interfaces.py
* Don't force_interactive with a new prompt
* Warn when skipping an interaction for the first time
* add specific logger.debug message
* Output status for `revoke` operation. Fixes#2819.
- Added method to `certbot.display.ops` to output confirmation of `revoke`.
- Wrapped call to `acme.client.Client.revoke` in a try to statement to
handle possible error.
- Added test for `main.revoke`.
* Added test for failure of certificate revocation.
Moved creation of mocks into RevokeTest setup function.
Stopped mocks in RevokeTest teardown function.
* Fixed lint errors.
* Do not call `unittest.TestCase.assertRaises` as a context manager (to work with py26).
* Fixed spelling error in successful revocation notification.
Added test for the notification.
* Changed informational messages because of confusing message on reinstallation.
Certbot prompts the user when it detects that an appropriately fresh certificate
is already available:
You have an existing certificate that contains exactly the same domains you requested and isn't close to expiry.
(ref: <path>)
What would you like to do?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1: Attempt to reinstall this existing certificate
2: Renew & replace the cert (limit ~5 per 7 days)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Select the appropriate number [1-2] then [enter] (press 'c' to cancel): 1
On selecting '1' (reinstall), the resulting message is:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your existing certificate has been successfully reinstalled, and the new
certificate has been installed.
The new certificate covers the following domains: https://<whatever>
You should test your configuration at:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=<whatever>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Your existing certificate has been successfully reinstalled" <-- Okay
"and the new certificate has been installed." <-- Wait, what?
The issue appears to come from assumptions in certbot/certbot/main.py
It uses `len(lineage.available_versions("cert"))` to determine if this was a
fresh install or renewal, and then calls either `display_ops.success_renewal()`
(which produces the "existing certificate ... and the new certificate" language)
or `display_ops.success_installation()` (which has no messaging about existing
vs. new certificates).
The len(lineage) test isn't the right way to make this choice. The certificate's
lineage length doesn't imply anything about whether we've just obtained a new
certificate, because there is no new certificate in the case of a "reinstall"
action.
The new logic calls `display_ops.success_installation()` on all "reinstall"
actions, and otherwise employs the existing `len(lineage)` test.
Additionally the `display_ops.success_installation()` has been enhanced to
accept an action parameter, and has the message reworded slightly to make
sense regardless of the action passed. The messaging is mostly unchanged if it's
called without the action parameter:
Original message:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congratulations! You have successfully enabled https://<whatever>
You should test your configuration at:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=<whatever>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New message on initial install:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congratulations! You have successfully installed a certificate for
https://<whatever>
You should test your configuration at:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=<whatever>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New message on re-install:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congratulations! You have successfully reinstalled a certificate for
https://<whatever>
You should test your configuration at:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=<whatever>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Typo in display message.
* Typo, characters transposed.
* undo changes to certbot/display/ops.py
* remove invalid todos
* Test success_installation() called for reinstall
* Simplify display_ops.success* functions
* refactor and expand run() tests
* remove unhelpful question about servernames and default vhosts
* add prefix about names found in config files
* test we include configuration files prefix
* Tell the user what kind of conf files were missing domains
* Revert "Tell the user what kind of conf files were missing domains"
This reverts commit 1066a88dae.
