* Add a dedicated configuration to define what is the HTTPS port for this certbot instance.
* Remove tls-sni in apache plugin
* Update constants.py
* Update interfaces.py
* Remove option
* Simplify a test
* Reconfigure compatibility tests to use http challenge
* Correct simple test
* Add a fake DNS resolution for HTTP simple_verify
* Debug
* More subtle approach: we monkey patch urllib3 to fake a dns resolution to the target IP, allowing every host header to be preserved.
* Private package
* Relaxed permissions on certbot temp working dir
* Move the fake DNS logic in compatibility test, to avoid degrading the acme coverage
* Fix lint
* Update certbot-compatibility-test/certbot_compatibility_test/configurators/common.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR is a part of the tls-sni-01 removal plan described in #6849.
This PR removes the tls-sni-01 challenge tests during the integration tests. The approach I used here is not to remove completely the existing test code, but simply editing it to use a http-01 challenge. Indeed:
* the current integration tests are strongly coupled, and would require more modifications that it is worth, because ...
* the certbot-ci project, that has already no tls-sni tests, will soon replace completely the current integration tests code.
Currently coverage invocation during integration tests on certbot core is misplaced, just before the OCSP statuses tests.
This PR move back the coverage invocation at the end of the script.
Fixes#6836.
OCSP responses contains a thisUpdate and nextUpdate that allow to calculate its validity. Certbot currently uses datetime.now() to get the current time when OCSP check is done through cryptography. But datetime.now() expresses the date in the machine local time, and comparison operators on datetime do not take into account the offset between two datetime objects expressed in difference timezones.
As a consequence, a given thisUpdate may be seen as a future date depending on the local time, failing the OCSP check process.
The error is not critical for certbot, as it will just make some valid OCSP responses giving an EXPIRED status been ignored.
This PR fixes this comparison by taking the current time in UTC using datetime.utctime().
Fixes#6698
Fedora maintainers engaged a deprecation path for Python 2.x with Fedora 29. As a first step, python2-virtualenv does not install the virtualenv binary anymore, in favor of python3-virtualenv, and so the installation of Python 3 virtual environments by default.
However, certbot-auto installs python2-virtualenv for all recent RPM distributions, and relies of the execution of virtualenv, and this is failing the process.
Since the plan in the future is to remove Python 2.x from Fedora, this PR follows this logic to fix certbot-auto: started to Fedora 29, certbot-auto will install and execute certbot on Python 3. This implies to detect that we are on Fedora 29+, install python3-virtualenv that will install also Python 3 dependencies and virtualenv binary, then instruct the process to use Python 3. This is in fact similar to EOL distributions shipping with Python 2.6, and for which Python 3.4 from EPEL is installed and used.
Older versions of Fedora continue to use Python 2.x, and their process is untouched. Four scenarios are covered here:
fresh Fedora 28: old process is used, nothing changes
fresh Fedora 29: new process is used, Python 3 is installed, certbot runs on it
update Fedora 29 from 28, already installed certbot-auto without rebootstrapping required: existing venv continue to be used, certbot runs on it
update Fedora 29 from 28, already installed certbot-auto with rebootstrapping required: new process is used, installing python3-virtualenv, python3-devel and python3-rpm-macros, Python 3 is installed, certbot runs on it
* Add a step to handle python3 on fedora29
* Update letsencrypt-auto-source/letsencrypt-auto.template
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update letsencrypt-auto-source/letsencrypt-auto.template
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update letsencrypt-auto-source/letsencrypt-auto.template
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update rpm_python3.sh
* Rebuild certbot-auto
* Empty commit to relaunch CI pipeline
* Add changelog
* Update CHANGELOG.md
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update CHANGELOG.md
This continues from the work of @sydneyli in PR #6671
I didn't do much here. Basically added support for reading data from sys.stdin to both tools/merge_requirements.py and tools/strip_hashes.py as well as support for reading files from paths passed as cli parameters to strip_hashes.py.
Reading the filepaths was not strictly required, but I thought would be a good thing to do in order to keep the tooling usage options consistent.
Fixes#6581
* Generate constraints file to pin deps in Docker images
Dockerfiles pin versions using constraints file
Pulling out strip_hashes and add --no-deps flag
* Add stdin option for merge_requirements
Add stdin and file path support to strip_hashes
* Address review comments
Fixes#6228.
Since OpenSUSE Leap 15, python-virtualenv became a source package, breaking certbot-auto bootstrap on this version. Then python2-virtualenv must be used to create Python 2.x virtual environments.
This PR makes certbot-auto compatible to prior and after Leap 15, by testing the existence of python-virtualenv on current OpenSUSE system, and then use appropriate packages.
* Cover case of OpenSUSE Leap 15+ in certbot-auto
* Revert increment on bootstrap for OpenSUSE
* Fix configuration for Leap15+
* Add comment about explicit installation of python2-setuptools
* Update letsencrypt-auto-source/pieces/bootstrappers/suse_common.sh
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update letsencrypt-auto
By removing all the builds on push to master, done in #6804, we also removing the coveralls reports that are necessary to calculate the effect of a PR on code coverage, that is part of the quality gate process.
This PR is reverting #6804, and another implementation preserving the coveralls reports will be done soon.
This reverts commit a468a3b255.
Fixes#5789
This PR is about allowing Certbot to respect the Retry-After HTTP header that an ACME CA server can return to a client POSTing to a challenge, to instruct him and retry the request later.
However, this feature was not easily implementable in the current code of certbot.auth_handler, because the code became really hard to read. In fact, @bmw was thinking that the code was really deceiving, and a lot of supposed functionalities declared in the comments were in fact not implemented or not functional.
So I took the time to understand what was going on, and effectively, most of the code is in fact not usable or not used. Then I did a refactoring against the bare ACME spec about what to do to prepare challenges, instruct the ACME CA server to perform them, then polling regularly the authorization resources until they are decided (valid or invalid).
And of course this implementation takes care of Retry-After ^^
I added a lot of comments in the new implementation, to explain what is going on for a future developer. The workflow I used is relying on the relationships between authorizations and challenges states as described in section 7.1.6 of the ACME spec draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-acme/
* Clean auth_handler a bit, and implement retry-after.
* Remove a debug logger
* Correct tests
* Fix mypy and lint. Setup max retries and default retry after accordingly.
* Ease a comparison in tests
* Update documentation
* Add tests
* Adapt windows coverage threshold to the global LOC reduction
* Update certbot/auth_handler.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Corrections under review
* Correction under review
* Update certbot/auth_handler.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Corrections under review
* Update auth_handler_test.py
* Reimplementing user readable report for failed authorizations
* Fixes two tests
* Fix another test + lint + mypy
* Update auth_handler.py
* Update auth_handler_test.py
* Fix tests
* Update certbot/auth_handler.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Raise directly the exception on polling timout
* Improve interface documentation
* Move the wait on top of the loop, to be used initially or after a new loop iteration. Do not wait for negative values.
* Always display the report about failed authorizations.
* Clarify an exception.
* Return, instead of break
* Use setdefault
* Remove useless assertion
* Adapt tests
* Improve a test about retry after value.
* Update certbot/auth_handler.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add a complete test on best_effort
* Add entry to the changelog
* Gather all failed authzrs to be reported in one unique report in case of best_effort
* Build complete warn/report/raise process about failed authzrs
* Mock set_by_cli in _test_relevant_values_common.
* Empty commit
* Revert "Mock set_by_cli in _test_relevant_values_common."
This reverts commit 9dfec8dfa9.
* mock less
* Use plugin_common code instead of reimplementing.
* Revert 2nd implementation.
* Simplify certbot.storage.relevant_values() tests.
In addition to cleaning up the code a bit, it also removes the problems we've
seen in these tests with the global state used in cli.py.
Fixes#6746.
Every commit on master is always the result of a merged PR, that has been tested by Travis. So retesting the merge commit on master is superfluous. This PR uses build conditions to avoid to launch a build for a commit push on master.
I also added the equivalent logic for AppVeyor. Builds cannot received conditions, so it needs to be done on init using Exit-AppVeyorBuild. This command does not fail the build, it finishes it prematurely with success.
* Disable build for commit pushed on master (PR are still tested of course)
* Equivalent exclusion code for AppVeyor
If you execute `tests/lock_test.py` or `tox -e integration` on a fairly recent machine, you will get the following error during tests executing against a live Nginx instance:
```
no "ssl_certificate" is defined in server listening on SSL port while SSL handshaking, client: x.x.x.x, server: y:y:y:y:z
```
Indeed, having no defined ssl certificate for a ssl port would inevitably lead to an error during the handshake SSL process between a client and this mis-configured nginx instance.
However it was not a problem one year before, because the handshake was not occurring in practice: the test just need to have a nginx started, and then immediately proceed to modify the configuration with a correct SSL setup. And nginx was able to start with a mis-configuration on SSL.
But then this fix has been done: https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/178
Basically with this, validation of the configuration is done during nginx startup, that will refuse to start with invalid configuration on SSL. Consequently, all related tests are failing with a sufficiently up-to-date nginx. For now, it is not seen on Travis because Ubuntu Trusty is used, with an old Nginx.
The PR fixes that, by generating on the fly self-signed certificates in the two impacted tests, and pushing the right parameters in the Nginx configuration.
* Fix nginx configuration with self-signed certificates generated on the fly
* Fix lint/mypy
* Fix old cryptography
* Unattended openssl
* Update lock_test.py
* First part
* Several optimizations about the docker env setup
* Documentation
* Various corrections and documentation. Add acme and certbot explicitly as dependencies of certbot-ci.
* Correct a variable misinterpreted as a pytest hook
* Correct strict parsing option on pebble
* Refactor acme setup to be executed from pytest hooks.
* Pass TRAVIS env variable to trigger specific xdist logic
* Retrigger build.
* Work in progress
* Config operational
* Propagate to xdist
* Corrections on acme and misc
* Correct subnet for pebble
* Remove gobetween, as tls-sni challenges are not tested anymore.
* Improve pebble setup. Reduce LOC.
* Update acme.py
* Optimize acme ca setup, with less temporary assets
* Silent setup
* Clean code
* Remove unused workspace
* Use default network driver
* Remove bridge
* Update package documentation
* Remove rerun capability for integration tests, not needed.
* Add documentation
* Variable for all ports and subnets used by the stack
* Update certbot-ci/certbot_integration_tests/conftest.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update certbot-ci/certbot_integration_tests/utils/acme.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update certbot-ci/certbot_integration_tests/utils/misc.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update tox.ini
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update certbot-ci/certbot_integration_tests/utils/misc.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update certbot-ci/certbot_integration_tests/utils/acme.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update certbot-ci/certbot_integration_tests/utils/acme.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update certbot-ci/certbot_integration_tests/conftest.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Rename to acme_server
* Add comment
* Refactor in a unique context fixture
* Remove the need of CERTBOT_ACME_XDIST environment variable
* Remove nonstrict/strict options in pebble
* Clean dependencies
* Clean tox
* Change function name
* Add comment about coveragerc specificities
* Change a comment.
* Update setup.py
* Update conftest.py
* Use the production-ready docker-compose.yml file for Pebble
* New style class
* Tune pebble to have a stable test environment
* Pin a dependency
The rerun capability in a test campaign can be a nice feature. It can also a bad design.
It is right that with high level tests, like performance or end-to-end tests, a given test runtime can depend on an external component, outside the scope of the developers, that would spuriously fail. In theses situations, having the capacity to rerun several time a test can be a great benefit. Indeed, as these tests are inherently flaky, the rerun greatly reduces their failure because of external reasons, reducing also the Pierre et le Loup effect (from a well-known french book for children): because tests constantly fail for no reason, you stop to listen to them and to not see when they fail for a real reason.
However this not apply to unit tests, or operations about code quality. For theses executions, the flakiness should not exist: a unit test is supposed to have no external dependency. A rerun approach would just hide a situation that is not desirable for this kind of tests
Also effectively I see that our tests are usually not flaky: so the only effect of the rerun is to give the failure state about a test three times slower. If a test becomes flaky, this should be fixed, and so be visible immediately in our CI.
For these reasons, I remove the travis_retry in the script section of .travis-ci.yml, to call directly tox and let the pipeline fails on the first error.
* Disable rerun feature of Travis
* Update .travis.yml
* Remove completely the retry logic
* Fix pipstrap on windows
* Pipstrap pin setuptools version, so explicit install it is not needed anymore.
* Rebuild letsencrypt-auto source
* Use sys.executable in pipstrap to allow straightforward execution in a venv by choosing the python interpreter from this venv.
* Update letsencrypt-auto
* Simulate test-everything
* Revert "Simulate test-everything"
This reverts commit b62c4d719a.
* Clean pipstrap code
* Reenabling OCSP cryptography support
* Refactor the validation logic of OCSP response to match the OpenSSL one
* Prepare runtime for OCSP response test
* Move unrelated test to another relevant place
* Reimplement OCSP status checks in integration tests
* Clean script
* Protect OCSP check against connection errors
* Update tests/certbot-boulder-integration.sh
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Cleaning
* Add a specific script for letsencrypt-auto install+help
* Remove inconsistent assertion
* Add executable permissions
* Remove unused variable
* Move testdata
* Corrected cleanup code
* Empty commit
Fixes#6755.
POSTing the `keyAuthorization` in a JWS token when answering an ACME challenge, has been deprecated for some time now. Indeed, this is superfluous as the request is already authentified by the JWS signature.
Boulder still accepts to see this field in the JWS token, and ignore it. Pebble in non strict mode also. But Pebble in strict mode refuses the request, to prepare complete removal of this field in ACME v2.
Certbot still sends the `keyAuthorization` field. This PR removes it, and makes Certbot compliant with current ACME v2 protocol, and so Pebble in strict mode.
See also [letsencrypt/pebble#192](https://github.com/letsencrypt/pebble/issues/192) for implementation details server side.
* New implementation, with a fallback.
* Add deprecation on changelog
* Update acme/acme/client.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix an instance parameter
* Update changelog, extend coverage
* Update comment
* Add unit tests on keyAuthorization dump
* Update acme/acme/client.py
Co-Authored-By: adferrand <adferrand@users.noreply.github.com>
* Restrict the magic of setting a variable in immutable object in one place. Make a soon to be removed method private.
